Alright I did some work and ate a bag of baked, low-cal Flaming Hot Cheetos which is not technically a meal, but it's close enough for now.
I am completely recovered from my illness by this point in time, I don't know if my germs increase over time but my immune system took this one like a champ.
BLIZZARD
I mean, thank Jesus I saved her last because only 15 posts but we'll get to that means eventually
Pretty much nothing to say about the day 1 posts here. Not much to work with. Suggests that Kermit is behaving in a jestery way which is like shrug.jpg and also welcome to Kermit. First meaty post comes day 2. Says that me being upset over Kermit's death seems like true sads but I could also still be mafia but also maybe not.
Blizzard wrote:Honestly, DM's posts seem pretty sketchy right now. Reads, imo, aren't the life-or-death kinda reveals that say, a roleclaim is. Yes, people can accuse you of scumbuddying or whatchamacallit, but at least they shouldn't accuse you of lying. Okay, I'm pretty sure somebody in the history of mafia has lied about their reads. Which honestly makes DM's er, reluctance? More baffling to me. VOTE: Dmboogie, at least for now.
This whole section is......strange. They say some mafia terms that I don't know what they mean because I'm not super into mafia and they vote DM but I don't really know why outside of him being slow to respond which isn't great. Everyone accuses everyone of lying? Sure people lie about roles but I don't understand how that relates to Boogie.
She unvotes when Boogie says he was busy, so that's good. She votes for Skraal, but still puts in some suspicion of Boogie in the vote. Even after posting the vote for Skraal, she still pushes on about Boogie parroting Ricky.
Blizzard wrote:nother observation is how Boogie is prodding the game along by tagging-kinda Ricky and I when we haven't voted. Don't know if that will amount to anything, but I'll remember that.
This comes in a separate vote after voting for Skraal. If Ricky flips in the future, this is foundation for suspicions on Boogie.
Day 3 and we get a regret post about Skraal. I know I said looking at these posts is dumb and I still feel that way but this one gives me a weird feeling. I know that my guts are not proper evidence though. Flavor claim as Sheree and I forgot to mention this before now because I kept marking it as "Save for later" but now is a good time to mention that Sheree is a notorious sneak. She once put on a fashion show with no fashions and defended the decision by saying she never promised there would be clothes, just that it would be a "viewing."
She says that if Boogie and I are telling the truth about our claims that Fen and Ricky are the mafia which rankles Fen, but since I did the same thing here I can't really count this. Also claims null reads on everyone who isn't Jimmy which.....eh. All of us?
Bliz then says they'll give reads on everyone, but then only gives reads on Ricky and I. She says I get one for having the most posts but it still strikes me as odd to only do the two of us. She covers my mourning Kermit again and says my joke vote for Ricky at the start could be because we're both mafia and I'm trying to distance myself. The reason I voted is because of his outrageous serial killer claim. She also says that my suggestion that the game has a cop and town could be mafia related because maybe they get the layout of the game before hand. This is patently ridiculous, BUT could be a new person misstep. She also says that it could be that I'm in league with Ricky and that my sharing of the music "could be seen as scummy" but may also not be. This is also kind of ridiculous that fun could be a scum tell and it was semi-relevant because it was related to Fen's claim, I didn't throw the dance party out of no where.
Also we see here that Blizz herself is pushing a possible Godfather setup.
Blizzard wrote:Though if the godfather had their usual power of choosing the nightkill for the mafia, it would make sense for scum!Rugga to mourn Kermit even in a two-person mafia.
Her conclusion is that I'm "either scum doing what it takes to avoid the lynch, even throwing other scum under the bus or a slightly erratic townie," laying the groundwork that either way, I'm not trustworthy.
She then gives a short null read on Ricky.
In her last post she reads Boogie. Yet again she brings up that he was suspicious for his day 2 quietness which I thought we'd dealt with adequately. She also says it's suspicious that I cast suspicions on less flavor-loving people due to Kermit's death. Brings up his his day 2 weird jokes and then posits that maybe he bussed Ricky.
Also this
Blizzard wrote:My general read is that she's either scum doing what it takes to avoid the lynch, even throwing other scum under the bus or a slightly erratic townie.
Her read of Boogie essentially ends in "leaning town but could be mafia I guess," which has been most of her reads. This is all either scum or someone flailing around, but I don't get the impression of someone just trying to scramble for things. This is someone who has spent the whole game going "I think it's Boogie/Rugga......but maybe not....." There is gentle nudging at the two of us in particular, but with a soft enough touch for her to back off and avoid the appearance of aggression while still planting the seed all the way down the line that we could be scum.
I find Blizz to be the most likely scum, then Fen, then Boogie.